Agile, Testing and DevOps: Are they a Separate conversation or a progression of capability?
DevOps, Testing and Agile have shared environments that facilitate working together. Spurred by greater demand for excellence, these three methods are more than simply adopting new tools and processes. The synergy involves building an evolving and a stable Continuous Integration (CI) Infrastructure, as well as an automated pipeline that moves deliverables from development to production to meet users’ expectations. They can work together, and the entire build process should be transparent, and it should enable and support development and operations. This transformation depends on: significant changes in culture; roles and responsibilities; team structure; tools and processes.
The Round Table session is for 45 minutes. The speaker at each table will have a set theme and delegates join any table that they are interested in. They are given all the topics with their joining instructions and again at the time of registration and so make their choice on the topics that they want to attend. This is a discussion group and so no presentation slides are necessary, but please submit a topic if you would like to chair a discussion on a topic related to Testing, Agile and DevOps.
Among the topic addressed are
Agile frameworks provide guidance for efficient operational software
Adopt a “build-and-run” teams concept
Automation and SAFe
Agile and DevOps – moving with flow based awareness
Testing: “Measure twice, cut once”
Continuous Testing – running tests at each stage of s/w delivery pipeline.
Improve DevOps with SAFe
Automating for improved flow
The agile release train and continuous integration
Scrum board Gamification
Modern Software Testing
Sustainable Test Automation
Individuals and interactions over process and tools
Working software over comprehensive documentation
Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
Responding to change over following a plan…… have been achieved and helped establishing a faster and practical way of getting things done.
We are inviting speakers – thought leaders, subject experts and start up entrepreneurs – to share their knowledge and enthusiasm about their work and their vision in the field of Agile, DevOps and Testing.
We understand that successful projects are written up as “White Papers”. Please share these with us. But projects that did not achieve their targets – “Black Papers” – are of interest to us too. They can be a very important topics of discussion / panels that you can present. Talk to us about both, we welcome your input.
Please complete the speaker’s response form and submit a proposal to present at this event.
UNICOM’s Code of Conduct & Views on Diversity
We at UNICOM strive to be a leading provider of knowledge to the business community and to engage the global business community as a specialised provider of knowledge. We strive to do this maintaining a culture of co-operation, commitment and trust. We want every UNICOM conference and training day to be a safe and productive environment for everyone – a place to share research and innovation and to build professional networks. To that end, we will enforce a code of conduct throughout all our events. We expect cooperation from all participants to help ensure a safe environment for everybody.
Our approach is that our events are dedicated to providing a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of gender, gender identity and expression, age, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, ethnicity or religion. We do not tolerate intimidation, stalking, harassing photography or recording, sustained disruption of sessions or events, and unwelcome physical contact or sexual attention. We do not tolerate harassment of conference participants in any form. Sexual language and imagery is not appropriate for any conference venue, including talks, workshops, Twitter and other online media. Event participants violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled from the event without a refund at the discretion of the conference organisers. Please bring your concerns to the immediate attention of the event staff.
Diversity: In our endeavour to be the provider of knowledge to the business community, we understand that this depends on hearing from and listening to a variety of perspectives that come from people of all races, ethnicities, genders, ages, abilities, religions, sexual orientation, and military service. We welcome diverse speakers for all our events, we do not always fully achieve this goal, but it is an ongoing process.
Sabine Wojcieszak, Agile & DevOps Enabler getNext IT
In the agile world we find a lot of slogans around the topic of failure: "Welcome failure", "fail fast", "Fail early" or "Fail often" are used regularly. And in theory we all agree that we can learn from failure. Some of us also dreaming of a Blameless Culture. But then daily business chatches us up...
The search for the guilty person starts as well as the finger pointing procedure! Everyone can breathe a sigh of relief not being identified as the originator of a failure. The idea of having caused a failure is often closely connect with the fear of negative consequences. There ae still managers who believe that "punishing" is the only way to make people learn for the future. And yes, people learn: to hide failure; to avoid work, which is more complex; to not look out of their own box; to follow rules blindly and many more.
But in our modern and complex world failures often happen because of a concatenation of previous situations. If we use the chances of having a close and detailed look on all these events not only from the retrospective point of view, we will be able to identify weaknesses in our system and processes. And who can give us the best and most qualified insight of what has happened than the originator? The originator is the expert for this failure or failed situation and allows us a change in our perspective: not only the retrospective but also the situation and decisions through the eyes of the originator! But to enable this we need to guarantee a culture of psychological safety and punishment is not the way to do this! This talk will shed a light on the significance of the failure slogans for our daily work and doing as individual, as team and as manager. The talk will also take a look from the Just Culture perspective on the topic of failure and classify types of failures. The importance of knowledge management and resilience engineering will be discussed. The talk will try to answer the question what can be done to close the gap between our theoretical understanding of how to deal with failures and the actual daily doing. It will be a trip through the world of failure which will end up at the topics of culture, mindset, leadership and discipline to make the audience re-think their own behavior.
Ilari Henrik Aegerter, Managing Director, House of Test / Association for Software Testing
Software Testing is a young discipline and as with many new things, it is not yet fully understood. Is software testing a technical problem to be solved by engineering solutions? What exactly is the goal of testing? What can you do to become a world-class tester?
A world-class tester understands that we are confronted with a techno-human system and that our goal as testers is to extract and deliver information about the product in a way that help stakeholders to make the right decisions. Having said that, it does not make a lot of sense to distinguish between manual and automated testing as this categorization is not very helpful.
Ilari Henrik Aegerter presents a model of software testing that takes both engineering and social aspects into consideration. A lively discussion during the presentation is very welcome.
Alexandre Cuva, Agile Lean Coach, Finix Asia Agile
So now, your large organisation applies Agile/Lean practices through a Framework like SAFe, Less… or your own hybrid or not any Large-Scale practices. You have a common problem, you have great process, you have already hacked your organization, you put in place continuous delivery, you have a dedicate DevOps teams. What would be wrong, you did like every other companies, but the quality is not as good you were expected. The continuous delivery is not really continuous, it may never arrive at the delivery point.
The main problem is DevOps / Craftsmanship, is not about any tools you put in place, is not about bringing an expert in Dockers/ CD… It is first about hacking your developer culture.
In this talk, I will share with you some experience I had in different large scale, like small companies where the Developer culture was not set to succeed, but after some hacking we were able to change their mindset and bring a new era in their development and delivery practices.
♦ Modern Testing in the 21st century,
Ilari Henrik Aegerter, House of Test GmbH
♦ Challenges with test automation,
Boris Wrubel, Software Test Engineer, Independent Consultant
♦ Leadership and DevOps Culture
Alexandre Cuva, Agile Lean Coach, Finix Asia Agile
Dave Snowden, CTO, Cognitive Edge
Before you place a bet in a horse race you check out the ground conditions. Some horses run better on heavy, wet soil others on the dry. The various method and ideology wars in the whole Agile movement is inhibiting innovation, preventing progress. Agile is increasingly starting to look like a highly structured commodity to the detriment of the original values. In this presentation Snowden will look at how to frame a mixed methods approach and radically reduce risk. Getting methods and tools defined at the right level, defining transaction protocols, looking at unarticulated needs and turning the involvement of testing to a much earlier stage in the development cycle all change the dynamics of delivering value for Agile and DevOps alike.
Seretta Gamba, Test Automation Consultant
In this tongue-in-cheek talk I will show how easy it is to disrupt or utterly ruin a test automation project. By describing seven proven methods to reach this end, I intend to give managers, testers and automators the means to recognize early on if their automation is in danger. And by ‘warning’ against possible defences I will actually give them the tools to counter and solve such issues.
Karina Popova, Head of Operations and Communications of HSC Hamburg
Most of winning the battle is managing the fight! How do you get employers to buy into Developer Relations when it's something new and unknown to the business? How do you make something ethereal to start with fit into known Agile processes within a business?
This talk is a walk through personal experiences of taking a product which had very little to do with the developer to execute a global strategy with leadership buy-in.
This is an honest assessment of how one company grew from one woman in technology to a growth strategy, involving everyone in social media activities, development and customer support.
During last 5 years, we established own agile style, where the main bases is a combination of a trust, a freedom, a thinking value, a sharing leads and of course DevRel focus. We would like to share it with the audience, receive a feedback and start discussions about the future improvements.
Boris Wrubel, Software Test Engineer, Independent Consultant
Scrumboards can be annoying. It needs discipline of all team members to keep it up to date. But there are some things and easy fixes you can do to keep a better overview. Boris will show how you can motivate the team and trigger the gamer in all of them.
Lynoure Braakman, Scrum Master & Programmer, Neuland - Büro für Informatik GmbH
The role of the Scrum Master is on the surface level easy to understand as someone making sure Scrum is implemented correctly and facilitating meetings. This talk is about the difference that can be made by Scrum Master who fully embraces the potential of their role.